Notes from the Left Coast

Drummond Pike’s Blog

I mean, the guy is a piece of work. He draws up social networks on his chalkboard and then, with enormous drama, moves from point to point in the diagram and assails that week’s targeted progressive groups as a conspiracy. He calls us names like “communist” and “socialist” and “anti-American.” He makes some stuff up and then poses the question, “Why?” as though it had to be true. He chooses individuals like Wade Rathke or Van Jones and, for all intents and purposes, assassinates their characters on national television without ever speaking with them directly, or offering them a chance to respond. He claims the mantle of “journalist” while engaging in practices that no decent journalist would countenance. And, he stirs up fear wherever he can, and then proclaims himself innocent of encouraging violent acts. All in all, he’s a pretty strange dude, and one with whom I could not disagree more on so long a list of topics, I can’t list them all here.

But Beck has just done the right thing, and he deserves praise, even from his rhetorical enemies. He has said very clearly, and forcefully, that Faisal Shahzad, the purported Times Square bomb plotter, indeed deserved to have his Miranda Rights read to him and to be treated as the law prescribes for any citizen of the US thus accused. This will not make Beck popular in conservative circles that seem to be coalescing around the idea that reading Shahzad his Miranda rights was wrong and another indication of how liberals are weak on terrorism.

Unless people misinterpret, I did not undergo a brain transplant that has me believing Mr. Beck now makes sense on much of anything. He continues to confound with things like his recent attacks on Sojourners and Jim Wallis with statements like, “social justice is a perversion of the gospel” after Wallis raised moral questions about the recent Arizona law on immigration that so many are challenging. For many, Wallis among them, the Bible is a font of teachings on social justice and moral courage. Beck deserves all the criticism he may inspire for such foolish, and factually challenged, remarks.

Do Unto Others As You Would Have Them Do Unto You

I was thinking a lot this past Sunday about my lapsed involvement in matters of faith. From a childhood and teenage engagement with the Episcopal Church, I came away with something that has guided my life since I can remember. It’s called the Golden Rule. Karen Armstrong – the marvelous soul who used her TED Prize to promote the Charter for Compassion – argues that all significant faiths on the planet have compassion at their core: my version went something like this, "Do Unto Others As You Would Have Them Do Unto You.”

For some odd, quirky reason I don’t quite understand, thinking about this basic tenet of moral behavior brought me to the most recent escapade of the Acorn Sting-meister, James O’Keefe, now awaiting arraignment on felony charges of conspiring to do something to Senator Mary Landrieu’s phones in a federal office building. Somehow, I think his parents, with whom the Judge has required him to live during the legal proceedings, failed Mr. O’Keefe in this most basic of moral instructions. How possibly could a faithful, moral conservative, as Mr. O’Keefe purports to be, engage in illegal and highly damaging acts intent on bringing down his perceived political opponents? I mean, have they no trust in the basic idea of democracy? Who would choose to have others do to them what Mr. O’Keefe is alleged to have done? Who would want, for any purpose, to be secretly taped without their knowledge? Not many, I’d wager.

I’ve supported Acorn for many years and in many ways. It is a good organization that has tried very hard to bring justice to poor communities. They haven’t done everything right, but I don’t think their foibles justify their fate at the hands of malevolent pranksters whose antics are now the subject of multiple inquires by prosecutors. Even so, it seems uncertain that the organization will ever again thrive as a voice for poor people in America.

It is clear to many that Mr. O’Keefe’s highly edited and illegally obtained videos have been the undoing of Acorn. It makes me sad beyond words to see how easily a dishonest kid of debatable morals with a video camera has been able to bring the rough-hewn organization, built out of the efforts of thousands of our most disenfranchised citizens, to its knees. And, Lord knows what his plans were for Senator Landrieu, a Democrat in a difficult state up for re-election this fall. One is thankful that, unlike in the Acorn case, the judicial system is already at work unraveling the conspiracy and holding the individuals accountable long before Fox News had an opportunity to promote even more fiction. I mean news. Uh, do they know the difference?

What I can say with assurance is that in the fascinating legal case that is about to begin, Mr. O’Keefe will be given what none of the objects of his efforts have been afforded – a fair chance to be heard without a presumption of guilt.

Somehow, amidst the din of the holidays, a true gem of an idea is taking flight. And, if it works, we may be looking at a way to (finally) fix what’s wrong with the money system in the US. And, again if it works, it should please all those anti-regulatory conservatives out there who somehow seem to think the Great Recession was caused by working folks who borrowed more than they should have to buy houses. Like all those Wall Street suits had nothing to do with it. But that’s another story.

Taking a cue from the healthy foods crowd who brought us the idea of buying locally, that sneaky duo of Rob Johnson and Ariana Huffington have been pushing this new idea…. “Move your Money.” What a concept! Green your money!…well, I suppose it’s already green, but it’s not Green. It’s not local. So, how to get this across?

It turns out that one of the mainstays of our holiday season is a wonderful film called, cleverly, It’s a Wonderful Life.

Initially considered a flop in 1946 when it came out, it has emerged as perhaps the best loved American holiday film ever. And the enduring story has such strong parallels to today’s financial crisis, it’s scary. If you haven’t seen it, do yourself a favor and do so. If you have, I don’t need to remind you about how a community-based bank can prevail over all those avaricious Wall Street sharks. And the real point is, let’s remember, and then act like, George Bailey in the film, or rather his customers. Let’s put our money in locally based banks that know us. Let’s take all those savings out of banks that are “too big to fail” because, in fact, they HAVE failed. Were it not for us taxpayers, they wouldn’t be in business today, much less enjoying record-setting bonuses that seem to suggest an inverse relationship between financial performance and executive compensation.

So check out http://moveyourmoney.info and consider the option. The four minute clip, largely from the movie, captures it all so well.

 

At Tides, we have long been on the receiving end of rightist critiques of our many activities and programs. Full of innuendo, remarkably bad conspiracy theories, untruths, and half-truths, their theory seems to be that our commitment to sustainability, human rights, and social justice makes us highly suspect at best, and downright anti-American at worst. The latest examples, of course, are these bizarre constructs being promoted by FOX’s Glenn Beck insinuating that Tides is promoting a communist and/or socialist agenda on the unsuspecting public according to a grand plan. It’s all part of the scorched earth approach that Paul Krugman alluded to in his recent column.

We’ve considered various ways of responding, legally and otherwise, and invariably receive the advice that its just better to continue on our way and not get bogged down in a fruitless effort to set the record straight.

While I’ve developed a fairly thick skin as a result of the frequent screed directed at us, and at me individually, I find myself deeply saddened by the condition of current social policy debate in this great country of ours. In all of our years of supporting progressive ideas and organizations, I don’t think we (Tides) ever lost respect for the views of others. And for most of our 33 years, conservatives have held the reins of government, and, until recently, the support of many voters. But in the tradition of a loyal opposition, we have always thought that advancing alternative views was central to the democratic process. It is in this spirit that we hosted the recent Momentum 2009 conference. Videos of all the speakers are available to all to view, consider, and, if moved, comment upon, in the hopes of fostering intelligent dialog about solutions to the difficult problems of our day. There is no secret agenda. We simply invite an open exchange of ideas. The question is, though, is that still possible?

There are many voices, particularly in some corners of the broadcasting world, that seem to believe the best way to prevail is to silence your counterparts by trashing them personally, often without any factual basis. Just bully them out of the way. I’ve been on the receiving end of this, in my small way, as a result of this blog. One recent comment gives a flavor of what one can expect these days: “Hey, Drummond, how’s it feel to be hit on the head with a shovel? Get used to it. There’s more coming.”

I’m too old to have my feelings hurt by such things, but it is a sad thing to see that our political discourse has dropped into the gutter in this way. Much in the tradition of “yellow journalism” practiced in the late 1800’s, the anonymity of the Internet invites extremists to vent. In response, many simply cringe. And, as we have seen recently in Kansas, some resort to violence.

Politics has always been a rough and tumble game, not for the faint of heart. But during most of my adult life, there has always been a parallel experience where rational minds come together to wrestle out where the common ground lies. In the best cases, they try to develop palatable solutions that most can agree upon. Many would argue this has been the source of much human progress. While I’d not argue that progressives start in that middle ground, the gargantuan problems facing us in so many realms suggest that we need to find this path as we seek the solutions we so desperately need to find.

Irving Kristol’s passing reminds us all of the tradition that he founded that many call “neo-conservatism.” In his approach, and that of William F. Buckley and perhaps our generation’s David Brooks, intellectual rigor, rational thought, and facts mattered in constructing conservative positions and proposals. Propaganda and character assassination had no place. Buckley, for instance, would face off against smart people with differing views in the most intelligent exchanges one can imagine. Quoted in a Salon.com article a decade ago, Kristol’s son William said this about Buckley, “Buckley really believes that in order to convince, you have to debate and not just preach, which of course means risking the possibility that someone will beat you in debate.”

Fatalists sometimes argue that the rising seas will put out the fires of human conflict and the few survivors will have no choice but to cooperate or die. Even the figuratively shovel-wielding commenter noted above might agree that civil discussion has some merit in contrast, especially if we can actually begin to work together to solve humanity’s problems.

Dear Mr. Beck,

Thank you for giving Tides such extraordinary and generous attention on your shows. In the “no such thing as bad publicity” category, it doesn’t get much better. My mother drilled into us that manners really matter, so thank you.

I doubt you realize it, but you’ve really begun to rally folks behind a commitment to change, of the sort that was so decisively demonstrated in last fall’s elections. I have to say that of all the things you decry about the people and programs we support, going after a video explaining sustainability to kids is really something.

Of course, your assertions about last night’s topic, The Story of Stuff (www.storyofstuff.com) were absurd, but the attention you brought to them really helped. It:

• Drove more than 25,000 new visitors to the www.storyofstuff.com site – more than twice their usual number of daily visitors. Thanks to you, 25,000 (and counting) visitors heard The Story of Stuff’s message and many signed up to get involved.
•  Raised more funds to help The Story of Stuff increase its impact and reach. Contributions are streaming in from existing supporters, as well as from brand-new donors who are now much more interested in supporting The Story of Stuff because you oppose it.
• Sparked an avalanche of calls and emails from parents, teachers, principals and school administrators from coast to coast about how valuable The Story of Stuff is to teaching kids about sustainability.
• Fired up the progressive netroots and grassroots in support of The Story of Stuff.

You’ve really done your part to help increase The Story of Stuff’s impact, and as our elected leaders grapple with the very real issues of global climate change and the need for sustainability, your assistance in rallying progressives has been just wonderful.

You know, with all you’ve had to say about Tides in recent months, we’ve never had the chance to talk. But if you are ever in San Francisco — you know, like for a wedding or something — I’d love to buy you a cup of coffee: Fair Trade, of course!

All the best!

XM Radio launched a channel last year called P.O.T.U.S – all about politics all the time. It’s sort of a C-SPAN with analysis – from both sides, I should hasten to say. Like C-SPAN they cover complete speeches and events unlike the conventional media. I’ve enjoyed the channel a great deal over the past cycle, in part because it provides content from both sides and hearing the primary material is always fascinating.

Yesterday, they covered a gathering of conservatives at, I think, the “Values Voters Summit.” The segment I listened to had a series of short statements from participants about what they were concerned about politically at present. Among the most fascinating was an articulate woman with a slight Midwestern accent of the sort you hear in Michigan. Her concern, passionately stated, was that the government was taking over the private sector and now owned 30% of corporate profits and wanted more. This is a stunning interpretation of the tightrope act performed by Treasury and the FED over the past two years, years that bridged both the Bush and Obama administrations I should note.

The bailouts, as the infusions of capital into the banking, automotive, and financial sectors are called, were desperate moves that may or may not work according to many. But there was pretty much universal agreement that the absence of these actions would likely have made for an even more severe recession or even depression. That the conservative right now appears to be recasting this as an intentional intrusion into the private sector by an avaricious government is truly remarkable.

This reminds me of the similarly amazing assertion, now marching steadily through the wing-nut blogosphere, that those who worked for the Community Reinvestment Act and groups that decried predatory lending over the past decade were actually the cause of the financial meltdown. It’s truly a stunning conclusion to draw in the months following the largest federal bailout of Wall Street ever. Everyone, with the possible exceptions of Fox News and Lou Dobbs, realizes that the meltdown was caused by greedy financial cowboys who, unregulated as they were, simply rode roughshod over reason, pocketed the fees and commissions to the detriment to the poor people duped by unscrupulous lenders, and then left the rest of us with the joyous task of rescuing the system from bankruptcy with our tax dollars.

A second speaker at this conservative function railed about the recent legislation passed in the House ending federal subsidies to private banks for originating student loans. In a move that will save some $87 billion, the bill shifts student lending to a direct system and would utilize some of the savings to increase federal grants to low income students to help them complete school. The speaker believed this was precisely what the healthcare reforms were designed to do – create a public option that would put the private sector out of business. What he failed to do was account for the failure of private banks in providing the needed service. Some 180 banks exited the field over recent years, and those that remained were challenged to sell the repackaged loans into the private markets.

What the right seems to miss over and over again is that the private sector can’t do it all. And, sometimes, they do it so poorly that it costs us all a whole lot more than a simpler, well-managed public system. No one ever suggests that police or fire protection should be privatized. Or do they??

After a couple of days to recover from Momentum 2009, Tides’ terrific conference on ideas for progressives…

Phaedra Ellis-Lamkins, on Green For AllJohn A Powell, on Opportunity and Race

Manuel Pastor, on Majority-Minority Economics

Jacquette M. Timmons, on the Economic Collapse…I returned from the mountains Sunday to the normal backlog of hundreds of emails, calls, and correspondence – all demanding attention. Somehow, I missed the Fox sting operation (Correction, 9/18/2009: The incident I’ve referred to was not a “Fox sting operation” as I wrote. Fox did not create the video, they broadcasted it. Several individuals unconnected with Fox shot the video) on the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN) that has been raging through the airwaves. What a story. A couple of “gotcha journalists” posing as a pimp and a prostitute sought financial and housing help from one of ACORN’s many offices around the country that serve the poorest of the poor. And they found one or two where part-time counselors with poor judgment were taken in and supposedly tried to help them game the system. It would be interesting, of course, to see what would happen if they had similarly set up “stings” with payday lenders, tax refund lenders, and other parasites out there who prey on the poor, but Fox, with an ideological agenda to reduce its antagonists to their knees went after ACORN.That the secret taping violated laws and ethics seems overlooked and, to most, irrelevant. The immediate firing of the employees by ACORN also seems unimportant to most. What matters is the smear – very successful, very American. To be associated with a scandal, even one invented for the sole purpose of harming an organization of poor people, not to mention one that is not real, is the door to obscurity in American social and political life, and ACORN, according to some, is headed through that door.I wonder how many nonprofit organizations – even big, well-heeled ones like the Nature Conservancy or the Red Cross – could withstand the kind of media assault and unscrupulous tactics deployed by Fox? I doubt many could. Night after night, the Fox mouthpieces babble on about ACORN. According to them, it’s some incredible scramble of a fascistic criminal enterprise foisting communism and socialism on an unsuspecting public. And people buy this drivel. The Senate yesterday passes a bill to ban ACORN from funding they use to counsel low-income people on housing as a result. One fake prostitute and pimp has managed to do what Bill Riley and Glenn Beck couldn’t do for a decade.

Of course, in the ways of modern media wars, it matters not that ACORN was decrying predatory lending (read subprime insanity) for years before the meltdown. Yes, they believed banks should lend to low income people, but no, they argued strenuously that subprime perpetrators should be prevented from issuing loans that were unaffordable to the low income borrowers. If regulators and Senators had listened to them, we might have avoided the entire mess. But Fox has a better idea: kill the messenger.

Tides Momentum Conference
Videos: http://fora.tv/partner/Momentum
Photos: http://www.flickr.com/photos/tidesmomentum
Tweets: http://twitter.com/TidesMomentum
Share: http://tidesmomentum.posterous.com
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/TidesMomentum

A LETTER TO VAN…

Dear Van,

Thanks for taking one for the team. It is so unbelievably absurd to experience the power of the rightwing attack machine, especially when what you are doing is so basically decent, and smart, and intended to help everyone, even the morons who went after you.

We know one thing about dealing with these people. Facts don’t matter. Fear matters. Whatever they can do to twist things to make you into a scary force intent on destroying our way of life, they will do. And they will do it in what Charles Blow so aptly describes as “talking in bumper stickers.” These are the same people who deride the President as being racist, who belittle anyone who tries to address global warming or poverty (not to mention healthcare), and who have literally nothing to offer other than wild conspiracy theories of a vast leftwing plot, though a plot to do what is always vague.

Now that you have stepped down, I wonder whose turn it will be next for the sick game of character assassination directed at pretty much anyone advancing ideas of social justice or sustainability. I agree with many of the voices responding to your resignation – it’s time we stand up against the McCarthyism and hateful speech that’s being thrown our way – and especially yours. It is un-American and anti-democratic.

Anyway, here’s to you and all you stand for in this world. I know you will land somewhere very soon doing critically important work. In the meantime, sleep, rest, and play with the kids. While we all know you didn’t leave to “spend time with the family”, it’s not such a bad idea.

All the best, my friend
Drummond

One cannot escape the media frenzy about the sweet young 11 year old girl kidnapped for 18 years by some wacko in Antioch. Details cannot be minute enough to elude broadcast — what the tents looked like, the vacant stare of the victim’s daughter, fathered by the wacko, the way the victim answered phone calls for his printing business, and all the rest.

In contrast, we can’t seem to find an article that accurately analyzes the benefits that the proposed reforms of the broken healthcare system might produce, or the damages brought down on us by the unwieldy patchwork that is the current system. Instead, we seem deluged by scary stories about “death panels” and how “the government is going to pull the plug on grandma” and the like. Fox News, of course, treats this drivel as fact. The rest seem to treat it as reasonable debate with virtually not a word about how the current system does much worse.

Tides Momentum Conference Website

Crystal Hayling,
Roger Hickey, Anthony Wright, and Jacob Hacker, Momentum presenters.

At our Momentum Conference, beginning this coming Monday afternoon, we hope to bring some rationality to the conversation about healthcare. Last year, Jacob Hacker (author of the “public option” idea) laid out his view of the prospects for real reform if Obama were to win the General Election. Now that we are there, and this is the highest thing on the President’s agenda, we’ve witnessed, as we have so often, the devolution of an intelligent policy debate into a mud-slinging contest in which alarmists are decrying things that don’t exist (death panels and plug pullers) and progressives — ever the earnest ones — are trying to convince people through complicated rational arguments.

What seems to command attention on Fox are these senior citizens who want to “keep the government out of the health insurance business” but even more adamantly demand that Congress keep its hands off Medicare…one of those government-run healthcare programs. That media really don’t say that much in response to such irrational debate is fascinating…and sad.

First thing next Tuesday, we are convening three very different folks to bring us up to date on where we stand — Anthony Wright leads Health Access California and has led numerous state and local campaigns for health reform; Crystal Hayling, CEO of Blue Shield of California Foundation and has worked tirelessly on healthcare delivery especially to women and children, and Roger Hickey, co-Director of Campaign for America’s Future, a leading advocate for national reform. It should be a refreshing session, especially if you are a Fox News watcher.

Why is it, I cannot help but wonder, that the current folks entrusted to oversee most covered people are getting off the hook in the midst of this swirling debate? The insurance companies are no one’s friend. Anyone you know who has dealt with a serious medical situation would hardly argue for the current system. These companies engage in terrible practices, trying desperately to pursue their business model that says they should collect as much money as possible and pay out as little as possible. How can anyone think this is going to lead to good health outcomes. Nor can anyone explain how having these companies provide health insurance to everyone will change anything. Yes, they may be forced to accept pre-existing conditions, but, bottom line, they will collect as much as they can, pay out as little as possible, and pocket the rest. The French, with their excellent single payer system, are laughing their heads off. Hopefully, though, we’ll move on from town hall meetings and get this thing done in some acceptable form. Tuesday morning at Momentum, we’ll be trying to figure out how that might be possible.

I sit here watching two high performance sailboats getting ready to race on this crystal clear day in San Francisco. It’s a wonderful time of year in the late summer, when the fog retreats and the people come out to the shore. Absolutely glorious. But me? I’m hunkered down in front of my screen trying to sort through my opening remarks for Momentum, our fourth conference highlighting the best of new ideas to advance progressive public policy.

Don Hazen, the character who conceived of and has built AlterNet, the wonderful aggregator of progressive news and commentary, has asked me a couple of provocative questions about Momentum. Several revolved around the idea that progressives are confused about how to speak to the new Administration. Are we supporters or critics? Have we already been so burned by the healthcare debate that we are ready to turn on the new team, or what? He wanted to know if our conference, very nearly sold out, much to our surprise in this most difficult of years, was going to answer some of these questions.

As I told him in response, that’s not really our role. First, the progressive community is larger — much larger — than the 300 plus folks who will assemble on Monday afternoon at the W (SF). One would have to be seriously delusional to think we might speak for the entire progressive community, although to hear Glenn Beck talk about us, well maybe we do! However, I digress.

News people, like Hazen, want a story, and they are very good at getting them. At Momentum, though, we are looking for what might become a story in the future. All good political stories begin with ideas that somehow take flight, get traction, and sometimes become policies, or at least political fights about policy, that really are newsworthy. At Momentum, we concentrate on the ideas. Last year, for instance, Jacob Hacker held forth on the transition from our current broken healthcare system and argued brilliantly for an approach that saw a "public option" as a pivotal tool that would help move the chances for change forward. Little did he know that his "compromise" position might so quickly have become the lightning rod for the debate we see this year.

One voice on this year’s program that should be galvanizing is Sony Kapoor from Europe. He will be talking in very direct and compelling ways about the critical need for international financial reform, picking up from last year’s speaker Rob Johnson who sharply depicted an "oligopoly" comprised of 6 firms that traded derivatives among themselves while telling all it was a "marketplace." Some of us, of course, wish we’d paid just a tad more attention to Johnson. We could have avoided much of the meltdown, but that’s another story. Kapoor, who worked in the belly of the beast, will describe how the problem is really much bigger than the U.S. Solving it, needless to say, will take more than reforms in Washington. And speaking of that fair city, we’ll also be hearing from Laura Quinn about Catalist, one of the most important new tools for progressive advocacy and voter engagement groups in a generation. Then, early Wednesday, we’re delighted to have John Kao (author of Innovation Nation) talk about what is needed to truly foster imagination and innovation in society. It’s all going to be quite a ride.

So, this all is probably not a very good answer to Mr. Hazen, but what I can assure him is that if he spends a couple of days next week with us, he will likely take away more than a few ideas that he probably hasn’t heard before. For change really to happen, isn’t that where it all begins?