Notes from the Left Coast
Drummond Pike’s Blog

September 4, 2008

From the Dust Bowl to Climate Change

Filed under: Democracy, Global, Money, Progressive Movement, The Earth — Drummond Pike @ 11:09 am

I’m a good way into Timothy Egan’s excellent The Worst Hard Time, a history of the Dust Bowl and its survivors, those gritty people who hung on and lived through one of the worst man-made disasters of all time. It truly is an amazing tale. First, how the boom in wheat prices drove speculators and real estate sharpies to plow up the prairie for perceived short term profits, and then kept plowing up more ground to compensate for falling prices as the market got saturated. Banks, largely unregulated at the time, took depositors’ funds and invested them in the frenzy, leading to the failure of thousands of banks. And then, the drought hit and went on for 6 years. No rain and scant snow across vast areas of northern Texas, Oklahoma, and elsewhere. And the land just blew away. Dust storms were so thick, drivers had to navigate from one telephone pole to the next. In less than a decade, people in the mid-west subdivided cattle ranches into homesteads, ripped up the grass for wheat, briefly made huge profits, and then sank into inexorable poverty as the rains deserted them, and the soil took flight.

Though Egan doesn’t focus on politics much, it is interesting when he does. Hoover, elected in 1928, declared in an early address, “Americans are nearer to the final triumph over poverty than ever before in the history of the land.” Then, as the Dust Bowl and collapse of the stock market took their toll, Hoover was forever saying that we are about to turn the corner back to prosperity, as though his wish for it would make it so. “All the evidences indicate that the worst effects of the crash on unemployment will have passed during the next sixty days,” he declared on March 3, 1930 (p. 95). Egan goes on, “By the end of that year, eight million people were out of work. The banking system was in chaos. The big financial institutions had once looked invincible, with the stone fronts, the copper lights, the marbled floors, run by the best people in town. Now bankers were seen as crooks, fraud artists who took people’s homes, their farms, and their savings. In 1930, 1350 banks failed….The next year, 2294 banks went bust.” The political seachange that occurred in 1932 was unlike any other we saw in the 20th Century.

I’ve been thinking about Egan’s book as I listen to the many convention speeches about what is right and what is wrong with America from the perspective of the two major parties. Democrats see a people who need more from their government. They seem to want a government that plays a balancing role by regulating markets, a government that provides opportunity and a safety net, and a government that works. Republicans seem to want less government, less taxes, and less regulation of business, despite their record of having grown government with huge deficits over recent years. It was fascinating indeed to watch their Vice Presidential candidate decry special interest funding while she has pursued earmarks in Washington for her city and hired lobbyists to garner a share at the federal trough.

It would be very difficult to argue that we face in 2008 circumstances even remotely like those of 1931 when a quarter of the population was unemployed. Our economy may not be zipping along, but it is not in the tank (despite the best efforts of the sub-prime lending hustlers). The challenge, though, is how to galvanize public action on two related issues that will require a political shift in will as occurred with the election of Roosevelt in 1932; those issues are climate change and energy independence. Right now, it doesn’t seem likely that those issues will affect the election much in one way or another, but if you talk with any experts in those fields, the globe must curtail the growth of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere or the climate system will spin out of control with unforeseeable results – mostly catastrophic, one might imagine.

Somehow, chants such as one heard last night – “Drill, baby, drill!!!” – seem unlikely to move us in the right direction.

July 4, 2008

What should funders do when things go south with a grantee?

Filed under: Giving, Misc, Money, Progressive Movement — Drummond Pike @ 9:22 am

One of the perennial debates in the funding community revolves around the question of boundaries and role with regard to the groups we fund. Are we venture capitalists where, by virtue of the grants we have made, we have a seat at the table? Should we insist on an E.D. stepping down if we observe poor performance? Should we withhold further funding until changes we believe warranted become reality? Let’s call this the “venture” model, as many have done.

Or, should we see ourselves in a more passive role, financing the work of organizations, holding them accountable to stated goals and objectives, and observing weaknesses with constructive suggestions on what they might do? Let’s call this the “supportive” model.
(more…)

June 29, 2008

What is this Momentum all about??

Filed under: Democracy, Giving, Media & Culture, Misc, Progressive Movement, Tides — Drummond Pike @ 4:13 pm

I’ve spent the last couple of months working harder, and more excitedly, on something than I ever have, at least so far as my aging, addled memory can recall. It is, believe it or not, all about a repurposed conference that Tides has done a couple of times before. Momentum. Now, you might ask, why in the world would a normal person get so exercised about organizing a conference? Here’s why.

I graduated from college in 1970 in the middle of Nixon’s first term (he was impeached during his 2nd). At the time, the Woodstock generation was in ascendancy and grinding through a social change agenda as though ordained by the gods. Civil rights had finally come to people of color, farmworkers had succeeded in forming a union (still hard fought by agribusiness), the women’s movement was emerging as a force to change seemingly intractable traditions, and the Vietnam War seemed to linger just to remind us why attaining and exercising power was so important. For me personally, Bobby Kennedy’s race in 1968 inspired a sense of what was possible, despite his tragic assassination. Looking forward, at 21, to the coming years, I was so certain that our generation was going to transform American society into an enlightened, tolerant, moral force in the world. How could it not? (more…)

June 25, 2008

Saul….time to step aside

Filed under: Global, Progressive Movement, Race & Class, Tides — Drummond Pike @ 4:40 pm

wade portraitWade Rathke has done something some would never have predicted. Resigned as ACORN’s Chief Organizer. Who ever would have imagined?

I met Wade in 1972, as best I can recall. Marge Tabankin and I were running the Youth Project (she was my boss) and had developed a bit of a competition to find the most impressive new organizers “out there.” The YP, begun in the Center for Community Change’s basement, was an operation to leverage foundation $$ into community organizing that involved young people – an attempt to bring the national movements of the day down into the everyday lives of disenfranchised communities. I came up with Mike Miller from Organize, Inc. in SF – a skilled, talented follower of Saul Alinsky’s Industrial Areas Foundation approach: parish based, working class organizing. Alinsky had defined the field in many ways and his Rules for Radicals was found on the shelves of an entire college generation at the time. Margie’s choice was this kid named Wade Rathke.
(more…)

June 11, 2008

It’s the economy….finally.

Filed under: Democracy, Money, Progressive Movement, Race & Class — Drummond Pike @ 6:10 pm

From the front page of the NY Times today described the first day of the economic policy debate that will likely dominate the upcoming presidential campaigns. Why? Simple: folks are hurting. For all the good and bad things happening in the world, it’s pretty clear that no amount of social “wedge issues,” like gay marriage, choice, or whether America is a “Christian country” or not, will obscure the pain of the subprime meltdown or $4 gasoline. Cooper and Rohter in the Times wrote, “It is a battle between Republican supply-side economics and a Democratic tradition that uses government levers to try to reduce inequality and spur the economy.” Indeed, this may well emerge as the clearest ideologically-based choice voters have had since 1932.

We have had for nearly 3 decades an unchallenged rhetoric that argues that we have to “free up” capital by lowering taxes on investments (capital gains) in order to stimulate the economy. While progressives have been shouting unheard into the media wind that real wages have been flat for YEARS and that letting the rich get richer doesn’t really help working people, somehow the notion hasn’t gotten traction that the economic policy elite wasn’t really moving on the right set of tracks. Some, like ex-Nixon speech writer Kevin Phillips, have been decrying the emergence of a new Golden Age, more similar to the 1890’s or 1920’s when the rich were fabulously so, while ordinary folks wallowed unable to get ahead. This disparity between the rich and the poor, he argued in Wealth and Democracy, threatens democracy at its roots when the wealthy gain unfettered access to the power of government, turning it to their purposes.

So, have Naomi Klein’s “disaster capitalists” been hiding out in the candy store after hours, gorging themselves on no-bid contracts, crop subsidies, military cost overruns, and government policy aided media monopolies? Sure seems so. Just listen to Larry Lessig on the toxic power of lobbyists, or Dan Rather on why corporate interests, particularly conglomerates that own some media but also a lot of other things, have everything to gain from a muzzled media. News has become all-Paris Hilton all the time. And meanwhile, who has noticed the corruption that seems to have broken out in DC?

Let’s hope the people have, and maybe that’s why folks are finally looking so closely at the economy as we enter this election process. How refreshing!

Someone to watch closely on this: Jason Furman, the new economic policy guy in the Obama campaign. Labor folks are unhappy with his strong ties to Robert Rubin, the bigtime Wall Street insider and former Secretary of the Treasury under Clinton.

May 31, 2008

This whole “change” thing.

Filed under: Democracy, Progressive Movement, The Earth — Drummond Pike @ 11:46 am

The 31st of May, and what a day in the bizarre world of modern America. A second crane crashed down to the street in NYC. A military judge in the Guantanamo trials was summarily dismissed after publicly expressing frustration that the military prosecutors weren’t sharing information with the defense. Is this a “show trial” or what?? The Obamacans and Clintonistas are slugging it out at the DNC Rules Committee over whether to seat delegations from Michigan and Florida where state parties knowingly scheduled their primaries earlier than the rules allowed. So the Rules Committee will decide whether their rules were really rules? And the rules shouldn’t be followed because….Hillary would lose? And then, yesterday, a Field Poll in California showed that if the elections were held today in CA, then Obama would win over Hillary and over McCain in the general. And a new report suggests that the world is experiencing more extreme weather than at any time since we have been recording such things. Oh, and GM is finding that people just aren’t snapping up those huge SUV’s that have been retooled (at a cost of $4k per) as “hybrids” thus increasing their mileage from 14 to 20 mpg. Now, there’s a shock.

So the real question I have this morning is “what in the world will progressives do if things really change next year?” In many ways, I don’t think we have a clue. We haven’t been in a position to drive policy for so many years, I think we have forgotten what matters. This recent experience watching the political machinations in Washington over the once-every-five-years Farm Bill does not give one comfort. For years, progressives on both sides of the aisle have been arguing that farm subsidies no longer provide a safety net for family farmers, as originally intended, but basically act as corporate welfare enriching the already large, successful agri-business enterprises.

So here comes President Bush saying that it is time to severely limit subsidies, especially because we are experiencing record commodity prices. And what did our progressive leaders in the Congress do? They decided that the status quo was just fine, not wanting to jeopardize recent wins in some rural areas. Wow. Makes you want to work really hard to make sure progressives win…..so they can continue the status quo? I think we still have some work to do. This whole “change” thing better be more than a slogan.

January 28, 2008

Transitions

Filed under: Progressive Movement — Drummond Pike @ 12:07 pm

I’ve been thinking a lot about the state of the Progressive community as we prepare for the coming transition to a new administration in Washington, DC. In my adult life, I’ve witnessed two significant transitions from Republican to Democratic administrations - Ford to Carter and then, more than a decade later, from Bush (1) to Clinton. There is no way of predicting if we will see another such transition this year, but it’s certainly possible. What I noticed in those prior experiences was how difficult it was for progressives to maintain their voice in the process. Friends and fellow travelers were jumping into the new regime’s many roles and jobs, and it became hard for folks to criticize them.

The right has had a better experience in this regard with their many, well-heeled independent think tanks and research outfits. They have readily criticized their friends in whatever new administration if they moved away from recommended policies. There is a lesson in this for progressives. We must think about the longevity of important voices outside the halls of government. For instance, I pray that a new administration doesn’t recruit Bob Greenstein (Center on Budget and Policy Priorities) to be Treasury Secretary or head of OMB (both of which he would be brilliant at) for the simple reason that he is the best independent voice on tax and budget policy. And, Larry Michel at EPI (Economic Policy Institute) plays a similar role on labor and economic policy. We have so few effective advocates at a national policy level, and we need to treat them like the national treasures they are, and THAT means that we need to support their work effectively for the long term.

The Democracy Alliance was formed with this premise in mind. While some would argue that it hasn’t completely fulfilled its original vision, it has come a long way in the right direction. Several of us agreed to constitute their new “investment committee” with the charge of looking into the future and trying to discern what will be needed in 2009 and beyond. An interesting challenge, as it won’t be until November of this year that we even know what the landscape will be in Washington. Nonetheless, the importance of stepping back, looking at what is likely to be, and then formulating some ideas about what the most important elements of a continuing “progressive infrastructure” will be could not be a more crucial task.

Do you all have any ideas for this? What do you think of as the most important organizations or voices that promote progressive policy? How can they be encouraged to maintain their independent role over the coming cycle?

November 1, 2007

Tides at Bioneers - “Race, Class and Power”

Filed under: Progressive Movement, Race & Class, The Earth, Tides — Drummond Pike @ 2:09 pm

BioneersTides’ presence was strong at the Bioneers conference last weekend. Tides folk, ably led by Berit Ashla, produced three panels, including “Race, Class, and Power: Structural Analysis and Fairness.”

Over 350 participants filled a conference room to learn from: Gihan Perera (Miami Worker Center),
Manuel Pastor (USC, Economist),
Colette Pichon Battle
(Moving Forward Gulf Coast),
and Van Jones (Ella Baker Center).

I thought they were at the top of their game addressing themes central to Tides Foundation’s emerging ECO Initiative, including:

  • How environmental degradation in communities of color is a symptom of the way we have structured the economy, distributed resources and excluded communities of color
  • Communities of color must be part of the solution, and that means political and economic power building in communities of color
  • There are terrific opportunities based on current work, and there is a need to build more and different kinds of capacity; and
  • The high costs we will all pay if we don’t recognize the critical importance of this work.

Environmental Equity, Community Opportunity

Filed under: Giving, Progressive Movement, The Earth — Drummond Pike @ 1:25 pm

ECO Initiative LAUNCHED

Enivornmental Equity, Community Opportunity
Over the past year, a Tides Foundation staff team, headed by Cathy Lerza and Sara Gruen, and aided by consultants Angela Park and Henry Holmes, has been building the mission, vision and values of a new sustainability initiative, now called Environmental Equity, Community Opportunity/ECO. Through a comprehensive scoping/field conversation process that engaged more than four dozen leaders and activists from around the country, ECO now has a mission and goals statement, and is putting the finishing touches on its program, which will include convenings, training, technical assistance, and grantmaking.

On October 17-18, Tides hosted a powerful convening of 20 ECO leaders from across the environmental, economic justice, and social justice fields to advise funding and program strategy; participants included:

Participants universally termed it one of the most powerful meetings they had ever attended, expressing a desire “to continue to meet together to help shape a powerful new movement rooted equally in values of environmental protection, social and economic justice and democracy “. The vision of this meeting poured over into the Bioneers Conference .

Not surprisingly, climate and energy were recurring themes throughout the ECO gathering As part of the ECO initiative, we are exploring the ways in which Tides can manifest leadership on climate and energy. Senior philanthropic advisor Cathy Lerza, assisted by consultant Henry Holmes and with great support from Center program director Farnaz Golshani, have begun to explore a Network wide climate and energy gathering to bring together Center projects and Foundation grantees addressing climate and energy along with representatives from Shared Spaces and CCI to identify what we as a Network are already doing and how we could amplify the impact of that work. Preliminary research indicates that over 50 Center projects and 200 Foundation grantees are taking on climate and energy. Still in the scoping phase, a Network climate and energy event might take place in mid 2008, perhaps in conjunction with Momentum. Great work, Cathy, and stay tuned, all!

BTW, I’ll be on the road all next week (in DC, NY), spreading the Tides gospel and exploring new business.

October 14, 2007

The Right to the City

Filed under: Democracy, Neighborhood, Progressive Movement, Race & Class — Drummond Pike @ 11:25 pm

I also want to acknowledge the stellar work of Maritza Schafer and Christopher Herrera on The Right to the City, Tides’ newest Donor Guide.

If you haven’t picked up a copy from Maritza (or viewed the video documentary on the Tides Foundation’s website), you should. The content offers a powerful model for organizing to revitalize our cities, and introduces basic issues of human rights.

It is a model for what Tides can achieve, bringing together donors and activists to maximize our impact and create strategic change.

Drummond Pike's Blog: Notes From the Left Coast | Tides.org
© 2008 Tides, All rights reserved.